The Monitor

The Pharr East


Dispatches from Pharr, San Juan, Alamo, Donna, Weslaco and Mercedes

13 Questions for San Juan commission candidates

May 1st, 2012, 1:31 am by

As early voting kicks off in cities across the Valley, I sat down with the three slates in San Juan’s race for commission seats 4 and 5 to pick their brains about some of the issues I’ve seen arise in the city during my time covering it. Here are some Q&A excerpts– drop me a line or leave me a comment if there’s anything else you’d like to see answered before Election Day.

Mayor Pro Tem Armando Garza will be defending his seat against Alva Treviño, an ally of Mayor San Juanita Sanchez, and former Mayor Pedro Contreras. Commissioner Eddie Suarez will square off against Hidalgo County parole officer Mario Garza and former City Manager Tony Garza. For more background on the candidates, check out these previous stories:

-Ex-mayor, ex-city manager to form 3rd slate (March 6)  -San Juan commission candidates vie for voters (April 21)

 

1) Do you support a proposal to ban the city from hiring or firing employees within 60 days before the election?

Armando Garza: “If we want to eliminate politics from this, why is it the City Commission deciding whether to call (hiring) an emergency? . . . I was very clear about how I would support (the ordinance)–that it would be with the director making the call.”

Suarez: “It’s 60 days before the election, then if there’s a runoff it’s 90 days (that you can’t hire employees). I’m against it. We need to look at it, but I’m against it.”

———-

Mario Garza: “I think that would be a good idea in the sense that they feel their jobs would be secure at this time. . . There are city employees, I’ve heard, at this time that are walking on eggshells.”

Treviño: Agreed.

———-

Tony Garza: “I don’t think we should be putting restrictions on department heads. If they need to hire somebody they should be able to hire somebody. . . I would hope that we didn’t need anything like (the ban). Not to criticize the mayor, but if you’re going to act on a rumor you should look into that rumor.”

Contreras: “It’s back to respecting the department heads and respecting everyone’s roles and if there’s a recommendation to hire someone. . . That is part of (a department head’s) responsibility to hire the best applicant.”

____________________

How, then, do you staff the city for the summer?

Mario Garza: “I feel that we can, we should, make an exception in that ordinance (for seasonal work).”

Trevino: “I guess what (the exception) would cover would be people without permanent employment. . . Lifeguards should not be one of the concerns.”

 ____________________

2) With regards to development, if you had to prioritize one over the other, would you rather focus on drawing big name businesses or supporting local entrepreneurs?

Armando Garza: “That will be determined by the grants. There is money that is earmarked for small business and money to go to large corporations. . . When we are ready to begin attracting business to our downtown area, I’m going to want local businesses there.”

Suarez: “We need small business downtown. If we can bring in a big box store in front of Walmart, that’s better.”

 ———-

Mario Garza: “A lot of cities are trying to promote big name companies in their communities for the simple reason that if we get a big name business your tax revenue increases.”

Treviño: “Initially you would need larger businesses because of the situation we’re in. . . We need to attract something that (shoppers) could stay here.”

 ———-

Tony Garza: “I think if we have a big name store that wants to come in they’re going to come. . . The best we can do is make the city attractive (for all investors).”

Contreras: “My priority would be to expose what the city has to offer (to both big and small businesses). . . There’s a responsibility that comes from the business owner. There’s a process in place.”

 ____________________

3) What, specifically, would you do in your position to draw businesses? Which do you think are the most useful incentive tools, between tax increment reinvestment zones, Chapter 380 agreements, sales tax rebates and property tax abatements?

Suarez: “It depends on who’s coming in. The EDC makes all the decisions and we need to support them.”

Armando Garza: “A lot of businesses like to know they have support from the City Commission, so sometimes it’s as simple as ‘Hey, how ya doing, I’m Mando Garza and I’d love to see you come in’. . . We can offer them a partnership and a friendship that goes beyond business. . . What (incentive tools) we have at our disposal, as Eddie said, really lies with the EDC.”

———-

Treviño: “We would have to see what is going on with (San Juan Corners)”

Mario Garza: “It all depends on the situation you’re in. Right now the city is hurting. . . There’s got to be a certain way we can promote businesses by giving them some type of incentive. What? I don’t know, because we need to sit down and see what the options are.”

———-

Contreras: “That’s a difficult question because every situation is different. I wouldn’t close the door on any of those options.”

Tony Garza: “When you sit down with a business, you don’t know what they’re looking for.”

Contreras: “If we were to be elected we’d be commissioners, but that doesn’t make us the best people to do the business. We need to bring the best possible director to the EDC . . .appoint (EDC) board members who know the needs of the community.”

 ____________________

4) Do you agree with the Economic Development Corp. board’s decision to fire its former director?

Armando Garza: “I’m not going to address that other than to say I support our EDC board members 100 percent. Eddie and I appointed many of them, and we appointed them because we trust their judgment. . . We don’t micromanage our EDC. . . They have not let us down.”

Suarez: Agreed. “We were not there to make the decision. It’s their decision.”

———-

Mario Garza: “At this time I’m not going to comment on that because last I heard there was some kind of lawsuit coming down the pipeline.”

Treviño: Agreed.

 ———-

Tony Garza: “We’re not privy to the circumstances or the reasons for the termination, so we can’t say that.”

Contreras: “I don’t know what happened. I was completely surprised.”

____________________ 

What would you like to see happen with that entity?

Armando Garza: “I would like to see the EDC grow as an organization and build to more capacity to attract businesses.”

Suarez: “They need a good director so they can move forward.”

Armando Garza: “And I’d like to see a director who has built-in experience and already has some contacts. . . My friendly advice to (the board) would be to hire a professional.”

 ———-

Mario Garza: “Just work together to push and promote developing business. . .Have people on the board who are, for instance, business owners. Get a variety of people from all over San Juan, a diverse group. . . That way you have different minds looking at different things in a whole different way.”

Treviño: Agreed. “They would know what it entails to have those businesses coming in.”

 ———-

Contreras: “I hope they get a strong director. . . When it’s time to look at the (board) members, one of the first things I’d like to consider is involvement.”

 ____________________

5) With regards to library issues, do you think library staffing needs to be increased at this time?

Armando Garza: “Initially Eddie and I did not see eye-to-eye. . . I felt like we could have had more people, but I’m kind of a ‘the more the merrier’ mindset and he’s more realistic and wanted to see how it went.”

Suarez: “Yeah, see how it goes. They haven’t complained, so it must be working.”

Armando Garza: “Could they have more staff? Sure. Could The Monitor have more reporters? But I bet Freedom newspapers would like to keep its costs down. We’re not a business, but it’s the same idea. . . Never did the management company say they were going to need a (staff) increase like what they recommended.”

 ———-

Treviño: Yes. “At least another two or three (employees are needed). We need to have it well staffed for the needs of the community.”

 ———-

Tony Garza: “I’d like to see a follow-up report from the city manager or LSSI. We need to revisit that issue.”

Contreras: “My thought is tell me more information.”

 ____________________

Should the city continue utilizing Maryland-based Library Systems & Services (LSSI) to operate the library?

Armando Garza: “I think we need to evaluate their contract and it’s like everything else, we need to look at it objectively. I’ll tell you this, I will not support a five-year contract.”

 ———-

Treviño: Yes. “It’s a good thing.”

 ———-

Tony Garza: “I’d like to see a recommendation from the staff. Can they take it on? If LSSI is doing a good job, that’s fine.”

Contreras: “I was against it when I first saw LSSI—I was a commissioner when the mayor first brought it to the city. . . (But) if the city manager thinks LSSI is doing a good job (OK). I mean, we’ve got a library and we didn’t get there by ourselves.”

 ____________________

Which programs/services should be the main focus at the library?

Armando Garza: “Computer education and children’s reading. I think we need to start really focusing on computer literacy classes for adults and kids reading classes. Generally, I’d like to see us offer more educational services of all types.”

Suarez: “I don’t know. (Would have to evaluate.) The children’s space and the computers.”

 ———-

Treviño: “It would be offering tutoring courses for the kids, computer classes, the GED.”

Mario Garza: “Have a partnership with the local community college to have people come into our library and offer some kind of certifications.”  Also implement a reading program for young kids where volunteers could help them learn to read.

 ———-

Tony Garza: “A lot of people want to learn to speak and write English. Keep programs for adults who want GEDs. Always, always, always have programs for kids to get them exposed to the library.”

Contreras: Agreed, kids programming especially. Also—“I want to make sure that (youth) programs keep going, but I don’t want to forget about the college student who can’t get a ride to Pan Am but can walk to the library, and I don’t want to forget about the elderly. . .I want to make sure the library works with the school district.”

 ____________________

6) Some other nearby cities have recently passed texting-while-driving bans—would you support that in San Juan?

Suarez: “I guess we need to check with the Chief– how many accidents does he have that involve texting?”

Armando Garza: “This is one of those organically grown issues– it needs to come from our community. If our community believes it’s a major traffic concern we’ll address it. . . Personally, I think we have bigger fish to fry. . . I don’t think the problem has been identified, so it doesn’t need our attention (now).”

 ———-

Mario Garza: “Definitely.”

Treviño: Agreed. “The texting, that’s probably one of the biggest distractions while driving.”

 ———-

Contreras: Yes.

Tony Garza: Yes. “Texting while driving is very dangerous and I’ve seen it.”

 ____________________

7) Which two to three neighborhoods are your top priorities for street paving/infrastructure improvements?

Armando Garza: “As far as streets go, for me I think Sioux Road and Eldora in particular require immediate attention. Eldora more than Sioux because there’s now . . . three schools within a half-mile radius. It’s a two-lane road and it’s completely deteriorated.”

Suarez: “Another one that might take longer is San Antonio. That’s getting worse and worse.”

Armando Garza: Also, Iowa Street and some of the north side neighborhoods. “I’d like to have an expert opinion on which to prioritize.”

 ———-

Mario Garza: “What I’d like to do is come up with some kind of analysis and see what streets really need repair.”  Possibly San Antonio Avenue and the area around Raul Longoria and Eldora Road.

 ———-

Tony Garza: Eldora Road needs to be repaired. Also—“ There’s a big issue with that neighborhood off Minnesota north of Earling—it’s a flood prone area.”

Contreras: “Another regional project we worked on is fixing Cesar Chavez. . . If we could revisit that project, that would be great.”

 ____________________

8 ) Losing the south side of your extraterritorial jurisdiction to Pharr was a big blow—how can the city can grow now?

Armando Garza: “If it does anything it lights a fire under us (to grow). . . I don’t think it changes our focus.”

Suarez: “We have lots of land here to work on infrastructure. What else can we do? We lost it.”

 ———-

Mario Garza: “The north is growing, it’s growing big time.”

Treviño: “Whoever was heading the city (in 1993) dropped the ball. It’s something no other commission had control over.”

 ———-

Tony Garza: “We continue improving the areas we do have.”

Contreras: “There’s always room to improve what we have. Plus, we have 500 feet (on both sides) on Stewart Road and Dicker Road. They can’t take that—it’s already in the city limits—and that’s prime commercial real estate.”

 ____________________

9) What changes (if any) would you like to see made to city staffing or operations?

Armando Garza: “I’d like to see us try to increase the size of our administrative space.” The city could possibly add onto City Hall. Also– “The other thing Eddie and I have looked at is the size of our Parks & Rec. department. . . I’d really like to look at us creating a space for them as well.”

Suarez: “We just got started with our new police station. That’s pretty good for us.”

 ———-

Treviño: “You would have to look at it in detail. You’d have to look at which departments are staffed and understaffed.”

Mario Garza: “I would like to increase manpower in the maintenance department. A lot of these guys are really short-handed in the streets and right-of-ways.”

 ———-

Tony Garza: “Right now we’d have to go in and evaluate. I couldn’t talk about changes now because I’ve been out a couple of years.”

Contreras: “You’re going to scare people with that (question). I don’t want people walking on eggshells thinking they’re going to get fired. I don’t know how to answer that, but I’d look at it when we came in. . . I would love to hire a grant writer. That’s the kind of change I would like.”

 ____________________

11) Which programs from other nearby cities would you like to see implemented in San Juan?

Armando Garza: “A hike and bike trail. . . I’d really like to see something similar to what McAllen did along Second Street.” Also– “I’d like to see us really increase the size of our recycling plant. . . I’d like to see it really grow and start promoting it more. Some cities’ recycling departments are revenue generators.”

Suarez: “Maybe a bigger pool. Our city’s getting bigger; our pool’s the same size.”

 ———-

Mario Garza: “I would love to implement like a (city sponsored) 5 or 10K walk/run. . .Having some kind of walk/run would really bring the community together.”

 ———-

Contreras: “Don’t text while driving.”

Tony Garza: Not sure. “Maybe I should get out more. . . I know we were looking at one of those splash parks, like McAllen has. . . That was very doable.”

 ____________________

12) How many city meetings have you attended (or missed) in the past year?

Armando Garza: Missed 2 or 3, mostly while traveling to Austin for legislative matters.

Suarez: Missed 1 or 2.

 ———-

Treviño: Attended a few after the election, not sure how many.

Mario Garza: Attended four or five, around the time of the discussions over Ordinance 08-08.

 ———-

Tony Garza: Attended five or six. “Some of those we avoid on purpose. . . But we keep in touch with people who go to the meetings.”

Contreras: Attended six or seven. “When I was commissioner and mayor I rarely missed.”

 ____________________

13) What, in your opinion, is the biggest mistake San Juan has made in recent years?

Armando Garza: “Losing our south side to Pharr. . . That is, I feel, one of the biggest mistakes.” Also– “The size of our water plant. The administration that was in charge of the commission was very aware (of the situation) and took absolutely no steps to correct it.”

Suarez: Agreed.

 ———-

Treviño: Not renewing the agreement with Pharr in 1993. “That’s the biggest one ever.” But not sure about any more recent mistakes.

Mario Garza: “A mistake here in the city is not concentrating on San Juan Corners, because that’s an ideal spot to bring in businesses to the area. I don’t know why they kind of put that on the back burner.”

 ———-

Tony Garza: “Losing the south side.”

Contreras: Agreed. “The city in general should have kept up with that. . . The biggest mistake is to lose property.”

 ____________________

What is the biggest triumph?

Armando Garza: “I think there’s a couple of them, but definitely would start with the library.”

Suarez: Agreed. Also– “Mercedes-Benz, the streets themselves from First to Railroad, sewer, water and drainage.”

 ———-

Mario Garza: “Getting the library built.”

Treviño: “That was a big success.” Not sure about others.

(On the opening of Mercedes-Benz and Audi)—

Mario Garza: “I can’t say that bringing these dealerships down was good.”

Treviño: “They got their assistance, but what did our citizens get?”

 ———-

Tony Garza: “The library.”

Contreras: Agreed. “Most definitely. . . Many commissions worked for that and it got done.”

 ____________________

13) Overall, what are your top three city priorities?

Armando Garza and Suarez: 1) The water plant, 2) Police Department/new public safety building, 3) Attracting new businesses

 ———-

Mario Garza and Treviño: 1) Paving streets, 2) Police Department support, 3) Library programs

 ———-

Tony Garza and Contreras: 1) Infrastructure and water/sewer plant expansion, 2) Employee retention, 3) Political unity/peace

_________

 

 

 

Weslaco battles over the future of Knapp Medical Center

February 24th, 2012, 9:43 am by

The fight has been raging since Knapp board members announced Nov. 30 the pending sale of Weslaco’s local nonprofit hospital to Pennsylvania-based for-profit health system Universal Health Services. Doctors and city leaders have squared off against the hospital leadership and the city has thrust itself into the debate with the discovery of an obscure deed clause that gives a city board the power to say yea or nay to the sale.

It’s been a long back-and-forth and is a complicated argument, so I’ve put together a brief history of what The Monitor knows so far, and links to original documents.

 

BACKGROUND

May 2010- Knapp physicians and others thwart a plan to merge Knapp Medical Center and Valley Baptist Health Systems in Harlingen.

Nov. 30, 2011- Leaders of Knapp and Universal Health Services announce that the hospital will be sold to South Texas Health System, the local branch of UHS, and declare an intended closing date of Jan. 31. The sale would make Knapp the eighth branch of STHS in the Valley and shift it from a nonprofit to a for-profit entity. Knapp board members say the sale is necessary for financial reasons.

Dec. 9, 2011- Many local physicians and their supporters react to news of the sale with dismay and anger and turn out in droves to meetings of the Weslaco City Commission to protest. Doctors register fears about losing patients, services and hospital control. City leaders take no official position on the sale.

Dec. 21, 2011- Though Knapp is a private entity, Weslaco city leaders consider drafting a resolution expressing an opinion regarding the sale.

Dec. 23, 2011- City leaders discover that, actually, they do have some power over the Knapp sale. A deed agreement from 1987, when the city sold land it had been leasing to the hospital, states that the city’s Hospital Authority Board must consent before Knapp can become a for-profit entity.

Dec. 28, 2011- Commissioners vote unanimously to approve a resolution opposing the sale based on what information available and hire an attorney to work on blocking the deal.

Jan. 3, 2012- Commissioners revive the mostly-inactive Hospital Authority Board and appoint several of the doctors most active in trying to block the sale to it.

Jan. 30, 2012- Authority board members meet with Knapp representatives for a more than 5-hour-long discussion on the position of the hospital. Authority members make no decision and request more information.

Feb. 8, 2012- After complaints from Knapp leaders about conflict-of-interest problems on the authority board, the authority’s president and vice president, Dr. Sandra Esquivel and Benita Valadez, announce they will abstain from discussion and voting on the sale. Both earn more than 10 percent of their incomes from the hospital.

Feb. 13, 2012- The Knapp board and authority board square off as each demands that the other be replaced. The authority board votes to direct attorney David Mendez to draft a letter to the attorney general asking that the Knapp board be removed.

Feb. 23, 2012- Knapp attorney Jerry Bell directs a furious letter to Mendez and the attorney general’s office, saying that Weslaco has made a “monumental mistake” in blocking the sale. If it is not finalized by Wednesday, either party can back out of the deal. Meanwhile, new members replace Esquivel and Valadez on the authority board and the hospital responds to a physician vote of no confidence against the Knapp board.

March 1, 2012- A day after the sale contract expired, attorneys for Knapp write a letter to city and authority attorneys offering the authority two options to settle the issue: 1) Arbitration or 2) $5 million for the deed rights. Or, the letter implies, Knapp will probably sue.

March 16, 2012- Knapp sues after the authority board takes no action on its request at a March 12 meeting. The lawsuit asks the court to declare the restriction unenforceable on the grounds that health care conditions have changed so much that the restriction no longer accomplishes its objective.

 

DOCUMENTS

1987 deed that blocks Knapp from becoming a for-profit entity

Knapp’s list of its medical staff and Doctors Hospital at Renaissance investors

Documents requested by the authority board from Knapp

Letter from authority attorney to attorney general Feb. 15

Letter from Knapp board chair to chief of staff asking to defer meeting with doctors about the sale

Doctors vote of no confidence against the Knapp board Feb. 16

CEO response to the no confidence vote

Letter from Knapp attorney to authority attorney Feb. 21

Letter from Knapp attorneys to authority attorneys March 1

Knapp Medical Center v. Weslaco Hospital Authority lawsuit

Hospital Authority response to lawsuit

 

Stay tuned. I’ll continue updating and adding to this information as I can. Also, drop me a line at efindell@themonitor.com or leave a comment below if there’s anything else you want me to try to find out about this situation.

_______

 

Donna bridge turns 1

December 14th, 2011, 4:47 pm by

From the archives . . .

I thought the Donna folks might appreciate this story that Gail Burkhardt stumbled upon in our archives. It’s from March 25, 1992 talking about the possibility of building a Donna-Rio Bravo international bridge, saying it could “be one savior needed to break a cycle of financial crisis in Donna.”

“It’s a slight gamble,” the story quotes then-Finance Director Enrique Guzman saying. “But if it’s done right it will provide the dividends the city of Donna is looking for.”

The story says the city was eager to take advantage of a bridge permit it had had since 1979 to break a cycle of financial debt.

“I definitely see this bridge as a money-making proposal,” then-consultant Robert Diaz De Leon said. “It’s a high stakes game. The question is, can you afford to sit in on that game?”

Click here to read the whole article.

______

City leaders, of course, eventually built the bridge, which opened one year ago today.

But the bridge has so far struggled to draw traffic, causing the city to spike property taxes and struggle financially. For more information, check out some of the reporting on the bridge in the past year:

Mexican president helps inaugurate Donna-Rio Bravo bridge (Dec. 14, 2010)

Leaders seek to attract more traffic to Donna bridge (June 12, 2011)

Donna bridge signs crushed before they could be hung (July 14, 2011)

Mother: Gunmen at Donna bridge fueled her, her daughter’s mad dash to U.S. (Aug. 11, 2011)

Donna bridge development waits for boom (Aug. 12, 2011)

Donna faces tough talk over taxes, bridge (Sept. 21, 2011)

Rhodes Enterprises says Donna bridge will see commercial traffic construction in 12 months (Oct. 2, 2011)

You can check out financial notes on the bridge here.

The city will vote tonight on whether to cancel the contract of Rio Bravo consultant Adrian Gomez Eddy, who has been paid $12,500 per month to promote the bridge.

Donna city leaders will host a “quaint get together” on Friday morning to commemorate the bridge’s one-year anniversary. They will celebrate highlights of introducing a “Ready Lane” for travelers with high-tech cards in March and extending bridge hours to 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. in May.

_______

Longtime Alamo leader hands reins to first female mayor

November 16th, 2011, 10:01 am by

Alamo has a new leader, after a swearing in ceremony Tuesday. Diana Martinez, who has been on the commission 12 years, said she was happy to serve as the city’s first female mayor.

The former mayor pro tem won victory over former commissioner Robert De La Garza by 155 votes—1,006 to 851 in the city’s Nov. 8 election.

Commissioners also said farewell to Rudy Villarreal, who served as mayor for 24 years.

“Thank you for the work that you’ve done for the city of Alamo,” City Manager Luciano Ozuna said.

New commissioners Maria Del Pilar Espinoza Garza and Trinida Medina, who both ran unopposed for open seats, also took office Tuesday evening.

For the full video from Jaime Hinojosa check out:

Longtime Alamo leader hands reins to first female mayor

______

Donna talks annexation

November 15th, 2011, 12:39 am by

Donna’s battle over the effort to draw thousands of Hidalgo County residents unwillingly into the city looks to be headed to court. Judge Rolando Cantu decided Monday to throw out a temporary restraining order that had halted city action on the measure, but promised to set a trial date for lawyers to hash out procedural concerns before the annexation is finalized. Donna city leaders voted later that day to approve the first reading of the plan.

I’ll keep updating this information, but here you can see the area in question (revised slightly from an original version) and other supporting documents:

Proposed Annexation Map- It’s difficult to tell which streets are which, so I’ll try to clean it up if I have time, but this is a map of Donna. The numbered red areas are the properties the city is planning to forcibly annex. In the lower lefthand corner is a list of the size of each piece.

Municipal Services Plan- Cities are required to have a municipal services plan in place before such an annexation explaining which services they will bring to residents. It includes both “hard” utilities, such as water and sewer lines, and “soft” services, like police and fire protection. The plan provides an outline of Donna’s role, but is vague about specifically what the city will implement when.

Temporary Restraining Order- Residents were able to hold off an Oct. 31 vote on the annexation only until Monday’s hearing, when the judge decided the process needed to move forward. This is the TRO that was originally signed. I’ll post Donna’s response as soon as I get it.

You can also check out these past stories:

Donna leaders give first yes to annexation (Nov. 14)

Group of would-be Donna citizens halts annexation vote (Oct. 31)

Residents react strongly to Donna annexation plans (Oct. 13)

Donna looks to grow by 30 percent  (Oct. 6)

Donna expands sewer lines to colonias, eyes annexation (May 26)

Stay tuned as the efforts continue.

______

Rhodes Enterprises to talk to Donna residents

November 9th, 2011, 10:26 am by

The Donna-Rio Bravo International Bridge is seen here in June. Photo by Delcia Lopez

 

Michael Rhodes and other representatives of Rhodes Enterprises will meet with Donna residents today to discuss bridge-area development.

The 6 p.m. talk at the First American Legion Hall, 318 S. Main St., will focus on letting curious residents know what Rhodes’ development plans are.

The Mission-based company owns more than 1,000 acres in south Donna, sold the city the land to build the bridge and has planned a $900 million development to surround it. But development has been slow as the projects wait on the success of the bridge, where an inspection facility for trucks has not been built.

Frustrated by slow city progress in trying to get truck traffic, Rhodes privately retained consultant Ernesto Silva to find a solution within one year.

A newly-formed group “Donna Citizens for Community Improvement” will be hosting the bilingual talk. The group has come together to express concerns about the state of the city, including the bridge’s challenges, the $1.25 property tax rate and city proposed annexation. The event is free and open to the public.

_______

Exactly how poisonous is a daddy longlegs?

October 31st, 2011, 1:15 pm by

I walked into the office last week and received the following letter, from Edinburg resident Paul Masters, inquiring about daddy longlegs spiders. Masters wanted to know if the oft-repeated children’s urban legend is true that daddy longlegs are the most poisonous spider in the world, but their fangs are so small they cannot bite.

Masters said he chose to ask me for help after reading my reporting on Pharr’s planned Costco and the city of Donna. In return for me answering this question, he made me a personalized Sudoku puzzle from the letters in my name.

So, to honor our arachnid friends on this Halloween, I’ll take a stab at answering Masters’ question.

According to the Spider Research Center at the University of California-Riverside there is some confusion with regards to this tale, because there are actually two species commonly called daddy longlegs.

The eight-legged creatures named daddy longlegs are not actually spiders, but members of a different order, called Opiliones. They eat decomposing plant and animals, but do not have venom glands or poison.

The little friends most of us call daddy longlegs are spiders in the family Pholcidae, previously referred to as “cellar spiders.” The myth is correct in stating that they have very short fangs, but there is no evidence that they are poisonous.

To be fair to the kids, the department notes that it is not necessarily proven that they are not poisonous. If their fangs are indeed too short to bite humans, the only way to test their danger to people would be to milk the poison and inject it into some unlucky test subject which, as far as they know, has never been done.

Popular TV show MythBusters also questioned this story and, by their methods, debunked it.

Raul Villanueva, entomologist with the Texas AgriLife Extension Service in Weslaco, said he had heard the daddy longlegs story, but said South Texas residents should be more worried about the more common and poisonous black widows.

I hope that clears up some curiosity among those who, like me, have wondered about this tale since childhood.

If there are any Sudoku talents out there, I’ll give a prize to the first person who sends me the completed Elizabeth Findell “wordoku.” (I’ve deleted the included answers.)

You never know what’s going to come across your desk in this job. Happy Halloween, everybody!

_______

Clarifying Weslaco’s salary postings

October 31st, 2011, 12:38 pm by

When Weslaco city leaders came under fire for laying off union employees, they  responded in a somewhat unusual fashion.

The city threw up a web page with links to budget information, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality violations, bond downgrades, insurance ratings and a compensation report listing how much all employees were paid in 2010.

But Weslaco’s admirable effort to detail the pay of public workers landed them in hot water again when the numbers led to confusion.  There were many discrepancies between the listed compensation and the employees’ annual salaries, and the list included former employees with seemingly inflated salaries.

City Manager Leo Olivares and Finance Director Bret Mann explained that they had created the list using the most recent W2s available to show not the budgeted annual salaries, but how much each employee actually got paid during calendar year 2010. The numbers included overtime, as well as extra money paid to employees who took a voluntary separation package, and showed employees who began mid-year with lower salaries than they would ordinarily earn.

To clarify, I talked with Olivares and Mann about the city’s explanation last week. I also posted the most recent salary information we have: budgeted city employee salaries for fiscal year 2011. Take a look.

Weslaco’s FY2010-2011 Salaries- This database, compiled from information requested by The Monitor in May, indicates the budgeted salary for each employee during the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1 2010 and ending Sept. 30 2011. Those numbers will be updated to reflect FY2011-2012 as soon as possible. Fire employees who were recently laid off or otherwise cut from the force are designated with asterisks. The information can be searched or sorted based on name, department, job title or salary.

_______

A brief history of San Juan’s recall petition battle

September 16th, 2011, 9:11 pm by

Petitioners trying to remove commissioners in San Juan will not be indicted for fraud, a grand jury decided this week, but petitioner Ramiro Treviño hinted Friday that the group’s battles may not be over. In the meantime, here’s a succinct breakdown of what’s been keeping the city busy this past year.

_______

 March 15, 2010 

A group of people calling themselves “Concerned Citizens of San Juan,” led by Ramiro Treviño, first file a petition in late February to recall all four city commissioners: Lupe Rodriguez, Armando Garza, Bob Garza and Eddie Suarez. The petition does not include Mayor Pedro Contreras, once a slate-mate of the commissioners.

City officials accuse the activists of being paid political operatives and manipulating or forcing people into signing.

April 30, 2010

Ramiro Treviño and his sister Yolanda Alvarado sue the city of San Juan after City Secretary Bobby Rodriguez fails to act on the petition.

August 23, 2010

Ramiro Treviño and Yolanda Alvarado voluntarily withdraw their suit after realizing the 300-signature petition did not include enough voters. San Juan’s charter requires that a petition for recall be signed by 10 percent of registered voters during the city’s last election, while Treviño and Alvarado thought it had to be 10 percent of people who had actually voted.

December 3, 2010

Ramiro Treviño and the other “concerned citizens” file a second petition to force a recall petition with 1,438 signatures, 24 more than required.

December 17, 2010

Ramiro Treviño and Yolanda Alvarado file a temporary restraining order on behalf of petitioners, demanding that Bobby Rodriguez, Police Chief Juan Gonzalez, Commissioner Eddie Suarez and private investigator Ricardo Tamez refrain from harassing signatories. Trevino arranges to have the officials served while at the city Christmas party.

The San Juan Police Department issues a warrant for Treviño’s arrest on charges of harassment against Rodriguez.

December 20, 2010

Ramiro Treviño attempts to turn himself in to answer his warrant, but his visit to the police department happens to coincide with an armed home invasion so nobody arrests him.

December 21, 2010-

City Attorney Jerry Muñoz files a counterclaim against Ramiro Treviño and the other activists, saying the recall effort has cost San Juan tens of thousands of dollars in legal costs and accusing the mayor’s parents of involvement. Pedro Contreras and City Manager J.J. Rodriguez express confusion over Ricardo Tamez, whom they did not know Muñoz hired to investigate the petition.

January 4, 2011

Bobby Rodriguez declares 486 petition signatures invalid, leaving the document short of its required 1,414. Petitioners are told they have 10 days to resubmit it. Georgetown-based attorney Bradford Bullock, representing the city, says the city has affidavits from people who claimed they signed the petition under false pretenses. He turns the claims over to the police department.

January 12, 2011

Ramiro Treviño is arrested for the December harrassment charges. He files the recall petition again and says he intends to file a federal lawsuit against the city for striking names without justification.

January 31, 2011

Police arrest all five people who circulated the petition and the notary public who certified it: Ramiro Treviño, Yolanda Alvarado, Ruben Navarro, Gloria Martinez, Jorge Rodea and Elisa Sanchez. They are charged with tampering with a government document, a third-degree felony. Police records say there are affidavits from 51 people who claimed they signed the petition under false pretenses.

February 17, 2011

Bobby Rodriguez declares the second petition invalid after he finds fewer than the required number of registered voters.

February 21, 2011

Recall petitioners are allowed back into city meetings after a judge revoked stipulations keeping them away from City Hall and commission meetings. A metal detector attributed to the recall hubbub remains in place.

April 10, 2011

Petitioner Ruben Navarro and his attorney Gregorio Treviño accuse Commissioner Bob Garza of assault after a heated exchange over a campaign sign that was partially caught on video.

May 14, 2011

The commission’s rival San Juanita Sanchez becomes mayor, but the incumbent slate retains all four commissioner seats.

June 15, 2011

The tab for San Juan’s out of town attorneys and private investigator hired to handle the recall petition comes to more than $25,000 over four months.

September 14, 2011

A grand jury declines to indict recall petitioners, finding insufficient evidence of fraud.

______

Pharr: Budgeting the budget-talks

August 5th, 2011, 12:17 am by

The River Walk level of the Hyatt Regency in San Antonio is seen in January 2008. Photo by Flickr user azeari is used under a Creative Commons license.

 

Pharr took off to San Antonio for a few days last week for a budget workshop.  Check out the full article

City leaders said the time away allowed them to work hard together without the distractions of home. Was it worth the cost?  Take a look and leave your thoughts.  (You can click the spreadsheet to see it larger.)

 

______

ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT